https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kstewart at efficios dot com
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-20
08:23:01 UTC ---
Vincenzo, I agree about the name, yesterday had the same thought. Then we have
the usual annoyances with configure options and switches, we normally don't
want to just rename in order
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
--- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-10-20 07:27:30 UTC ---
no side effects for the time being.
I've tried only small applications though.
I would suggest to rename --disable-visibility
--disable-std-visibility or similar as, applied to to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-20
01:19:49 UTC ---
I would be curious to know if you are seeing something else when you configure
your build with --disable-visibility.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||almeidaraf at gmail dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
--- Comment #4 from Melanie Cappelaere 2011-06-06
16:27:22 UTC ---
I don't think it does, but it also doesn't matter for this bug report; symbols
are not hidden while they should be.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
Wolfgang Bangerth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bangerth at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
--- Comment #2 from Melanie Cappelaere 2011-05-04
14:19:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 24181
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24181
Example with custom allocator
Thank you for the workaround.
Little side note: this bug also ap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
