http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47960
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47960
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-02
19:45:02 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=153768
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47960
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-02
19:43:17 UTC ---
Yes, from http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html
"The default behavior for comparing typeinfo names has changed, so in
, __GXX_MERGED_TYPEINFO_NAMES now defaults to zero."
I think
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47960
--- Comment #4 from Andy 2011-03-02 18:51:49 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > works as expected with gcc 4.5, possibly due to the change to
> > __GXX_MERGED_TYPEINFO_NAMES
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> sorry, I do not watc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47960
--- Comment #3 from Andy 2011-03-02 18:50:56 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> works as expected with gcc 4.5, possibly due to the change to
> __GXX_MERGED_TYPEINFO_NAMES
Hi Jonathan,
sorry, I do not watch closely the progress, do you mean tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47960
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-02
18:12:13 UTC ---
works as expected with gcc 4.5, possibly due to the change to
__GXX_MERGED_TYPEINFO_NAMES
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47960
--- Comment #1 from Andy 2011-03-02 17:58:58 UTC
---
Created attachment 23518
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23518
test case
