http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
--- Comment #8 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-05-30 07:34:17 UTC ---
"manu at gcc dot gnu.org" a écrit:
> Well, we already have pragma system_header, we could extend it with an
> optional
> parameter.
>
> #pragma GCC system_header "canoni
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-29
12:14:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> #pragma GCC canonical_header [header-name] [identifier]
I don't think we even need to do it per-identifier.
If each standard header started with:
#pragm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-29
12:08:24 UTC ---
For PR 52974 Manu made a huge improvement, so that we only get
/some/ugly/path/the/user/didn't/include instead of
/some/ugly/path/the/user/can't/even/parse/../../../didn't/include, b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-29
12:02:58 UTC ---
Jon, is this a duplicate? A couple of weeks ago I saw a patch related to this
issue but I don't see it mentioned here?!?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-07
16:48:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:31:22PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > It's not entirely trivial, because e.g. std::tuple_size is declared in more
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
--- Comment #2 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-07 15:49:15 UTC ---
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:31:22PM +, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> It's not entirely trivial, because e.g. std::tuple_size is declared in more
> than one place
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46836
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
