--- Comment #12 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 15:54 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 15:40 ---
Subject: Bug 45635
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 15 15:39:57 2010
New Revision: 164311
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164311
Log:
PR c++/45635
* class.c (build_vtbl_initializer):
--- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-15 06:56 ---
Thanks. Though, both #c5 and #c6 patches are C++ FE patches and thus I can't
see how they could ever be related to a C testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45635
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-15 04:09 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=21792)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21792&action=view) [edit]
> gcc46-pr45635.patch
>
> Alternatively, we can avoid computing the address o
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 19:25 ---
Could you please also try the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45635#c5 patch? Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45635
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-14 19:22 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created an attachment (id=21793)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21793&action=view) [edit]
> Proposed patch
>
> Hi,
> this patch should solve the problem (dive into ADD
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 16:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=21793)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21793&action=view)
Proposed patch
Hi,
this patch should solve the problem (dive into ADDR_EXPR to get actual
fndecl).I no longer h
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 14:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=21792)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21792&action=view)
gcc46-pr45635.patch
Alternatively, we can avoid computing the address of fn altogether on
TARGET_VTABLE_USES_DESC
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 14:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=21791)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21791&action=view)
gcc46-pr45635.patch
Fix.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfir
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-11 12:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=21776)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21776&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45635
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45635
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-10 17:14 ---
Hi,
would be possible to have preprocessed source for a cross compiler?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45635
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-10 14:52 ---
It may be caused by revision 164148:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00440.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45635
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
|
15 matches
Mail list logo
