http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #13 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
Ok, it looks like this is no gcc problem. If I rebuild gcc with binutils 2.22
it works. If I compile gcc with binutils 2.23.[12] it fails. Having a gcc built
with binutils 2.23.2 and building the program wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
>> I don't have the least idea what's going on here, and cannot debug
>> issues on Linux/SPARC since I don't have access to that platform.
>
> S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #11 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
> I don't have the least idea what's going on here, and cannot debug
> issues on Linux/SPARC since I don't have access to that platform.
Sadly I can't give you direct access to my machine, but I'm willing t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
> I get the same problem using gcc 4.5, 4.7, and 4.8 on a Sun Fire V240 running
> Gentoo. Even if the compiler says "Gentoo" it is built with use
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #9 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
Created attachment 31314
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31314&action=edit
ii file of testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
Rolf Eike Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@sf-mail.de
--- Comment #8 from Rolf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-09-26 13:22:58 UTC ---
Not easily, because I don't have an installed version with GNU ld
around, and haven't figured out all the options necessary to compile and
link with an uninstalled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at CeBiTec dot
|
--- Comment #4 from paul dot shaklan at solipsys dot com 2010-04-26 16:56
---
Exactly the same results with libfoo.so is built with fPIC
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-12 17:58 ---
What happens if you do:
g++ -v -save-temps -G -o libfoo.so foo.C -fPIC
aka add -fPIC when building the shared library?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #2 from paul dot shaklan at solipsys dot com 2010-04-12 17:39
---
Created an attachment (id=20369)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20369&action=view)
.ii file associated with main.C
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #1 from paul dot shaklan at solipsys dot com 2010-04-12 17:38
---
Created an attachment (id=20368)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20368&action=view)
.ii file associated with foo.C
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
13 matches
Mail list logo