--- Comment #4 from pbdr at uea dot ac dot uk 2009-12-08 14:35 ---
Mmmhh ... indeed ... I really though my processor for sse4, but it doesn't seem
to be. Sorry about such a bad mistake.
--
pbdr at uea dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 14:30 ---
Is your CPU SSE4 capable? cat /proc/cpuinfo would reveal this.
Can you post disassembly at the point of SIGILL (run it under gdb,
p/x $pc
disas $pc-64 $pc+64
info reg
when it crashes?
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot or
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42332
--
pbdr at uea dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42332
--- Comment #2 from pbdr at uea dot ac dot uk 2009-12-08 14:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=19261)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19261&action=view)
preprocessed file for the main program
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42332
--- Comment #1 from pbdr at uea dot ac dot uk 2009-12-08 14:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=19260)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19260&action=view)
preprocessed file for the library
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42332
