http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc do
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 19:44 ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#225
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#993
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-09 16:00 ---
Actually this is a combition of two issues really. First is argument dependent
lookup for fundamental types, do they have an assoicated namespaces (I think
there is a bug report for that)?
And then the other bug is
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-09 12:18 ---
EDG accepts it in strict mode though I also think it's invalid.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995
--- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-09 12:01 ---
probably related to PR 23885 and/or PR 16635
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995
