http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40145
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40145
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-28 23:14:07 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Sep 28 23:14:04 2011
New Revision: 179323
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179323
Log:
2011-09-28 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 21:43 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> 4.4.2 also warns, 4.5.0 doesn't
Jonathan, could you add a testcase for GCC 4.5 so we avoid regressing?
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 15:03 ---
4.4.2 also warns, 4.5.0 doesn't
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40145
--- Comment #1 from thiago at kde dot org 2010-03-03 14:46 ---
Anyone?
This is not a showstopper, but produces unnecessary (and incorrect) warnings.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40145