[Bug c++/40085] [4.5 Regression] ICE compiling libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx

2009-11-12 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-13 05:21 --- Appears to have been fixed at some point. -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/40085] [4.5 Regression] ICE compiling libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx

2009-11-12 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-11-12 23:33 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ICE compiling libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx > --- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 23:14 --- > I'm not seeing this with a cross-compiler. Is

[Bug c++/40085] [4.5 Regression] ICE compiling libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx

2009-11-12 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-12 23:14 --- I'm not seeing this with a cross-compiler. Is it still broken? -- jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/40085] [4.5 Regression] ICE compiling libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx

2009-06-04 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40085

[Bug c++/40085] [4.5 Regression] ICE compiling libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx

2009-05-24 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-24 17:22 --- Although this bug doesn't seem to currently trigger on i686 or x86_64 linux, it is still failing on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/40085] [4.5 Regression] ICE compiling libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx

2009-05-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40085

[Bug c++/40085] [4.5 Regression] ICE compiling libmudflap.c++/fail24-frag.cxx

2009-05-09 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-10 01:54 --- I haven't analyzed this one, but only because I've found that particular testcase also failing before expand from SSA, e.g: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-04/msg02860.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testr