--- Comment #5 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-04-30 19:32 ---
Please close this issue. I think the real problem is in libc, not in the
compiler. (test passes with -fno-threadsafe-statics). Thank you for support.
--
sergei_lus at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Rem
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-04-29 18:18
---
Well, first, spell-out *which* specific target it is. Actually, however, if it
is a completely unsupported target, I'm not even sure it makes sense to keep
the PR open... Other maintainers may know better than
--- Comment #3 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-04-29 18:02 ---
Thanks for prompt response...
This is an unsupported target, so I guess i will have to narrow it down a bit.
Any suggestions on where to start?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-04-29 16:47
---
Target? On x86_64, I can't reproduce your outputs, I'm consistently getting 1,
irrespective of the optimization level and of the release branch (by the way,
only 4.3 and 4.4 are maintained today)
--
paolo d
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 16:44 ---
Works for me on i386-darwin and i686-linux-gnu on the trunk, I get the output
of 1 which is the correct value.
With i686-linux-gnu it works also with Debian's GCC 4.3.2.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
