[Bug c++/39728] diagnostic for private operator= is voluminous and unhelpful

2012-04-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39728 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-16 11:10:07 UTC --- Maybe the most widely used term is "compiler-generated" but I prefer implicity defined. (In reply to comment #2) > * Do not show "In member function", it clutters the output and it

[Bug c++/39728] diagnostic for private operator= is voluminous and unhelpful

2012-04-16 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39728 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-04-16 10:53:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Every C++ programmer knows that the compiler implicitly defines special member > functions, including the copy-assignment operator but I don't really l

[Bug c++/39728] diagnostic for private operator= is voluminous and unhelpful

2012-04-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39728 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-16 10:44:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think libstdc++ include pathes make the error message useless Manu has a patch for that in PR 52974 (In reply to comment #2) > * What is a "synthesi

[Bug c++/39728] diagnostic for private operator= is voluminous and unhelpful

2012-04-15 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39728 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|