--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-04 22:31 ---
Fixed for 4.5.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASS
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-04 22:29 ---
Subject: Bug 39413
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 4 22:29:35 2009
New Revision: 153920
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=153920
Log:
PR c++/39413
* search.c (lookup_base): Don't comp
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-04 21:27 ---
This is not a SFINAE issue, the bug is that we shouldn't be instantiating
member_ptr in the first place in order to resolve the operator= overload.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remo
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-03-17 12:55
---
Sorry, CC-ed Jakub instead of Jason ;)
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-03-17 12:55
---
Jason, are you willing to help triaging this one?
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39413
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-03-09 18:17
---
Volunteers for a better Summary?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39413
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-03-09 18:10
---
The below, not using any header neither C++0x mode (very likely can be further
reduced), doesn't compile with mainline and 4_3-branch, does with EDG-based
compilers in strict mode:
template
class __static_as
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-03-09 17:48
---
let's try to simplify the issue as much as possible... are defaulted / deleted
functions really necessary to trigger the bug? Thus, is c++0x mode really
necessary?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
