[Bug c++/38260] vector_size attribute vs specialization

2014-06-11 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38260 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/38260] vector_size attribute vs specialization

2014-06-11 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38260 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Comm

[Bug c++/38260] vector_size attribute vs specialization

2012-10-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38260 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-15 13:54:43 UTC --- Yes. This one seems special, it seems purely a parsing issue.

[Bug c++/38260] vector_size attribute vs specialization

2012-10-15 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38260 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-15 12:59:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Marc, are you aware of this? Yes, attributes don't work so well with templates. This particular case should be fixable, but I'd rather we had a compl

[Bug c++/38260] vector_size attribute vs specialization

2012-10-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38260 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/38260] vector_size attribute vs specialization

2012-01-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38260 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.7.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski