https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|WAI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #3 from mrs at apple dot com 2008-11-12 18:33 ---
I'm merely eching bits from the clang development list... Now they think the
above doesn't apply, but 3.4.5p3 does:
3 If the unqualified-id is
∼ type-name, the type-name is looked up in the context of the entire
postfix-expre
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-12 00:35 ---
See PR 12333 also.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-12 00:32 ---
I still think this is valid code ... There are defect reports against this
area too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087
