--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 21:39 ---
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 20:34 ---
Subject: Bug 37189
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Sep 3 20:33:21 2008
New Revision: 139955
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139955
Log:
PR c++/37189
* cp-tree.h (defer_mark_used_calls,
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 08:12 ---
There is nothing strange about it, it is just a bug that needs to be fixed, and
is caused by the design decision that the sharing status of implicitly
determined is computed during the gimplification phase, but synthet
--- Comment #5 from singler at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 07:18 ---
To my understanding of the OpenMP standard, a variable not mentioned in the
task pragma is "firstprivate" by default. So stating this fact explicitly
should not change anything, which makes things even stranger.
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-25 02:05 ---
We are gimplifying the copy constructor while gimplifying something else ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37189
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-25 02:03 ---
Reduced testcase:
struct optional_base {
optional_base() {}
optional_base ( optional_base const& rhs ) {}
};
struct Point_container { optional_base m_b ; };
int create_internal_node(Point_container& c)
{
Poin
