--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:20
---
GCC 4.3.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #12 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:04 ---
4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 17:54 ---
Doug, thanks for your comments.
I have submitted the patch to the list
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00082.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36408
--- Comment #10 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 14:05
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > - the error message we give in this case is pretty poor. Here we have an
> >empty initializer, but the error message we get back is "void value not
> >ignored
> >as it ought to be", w
--- Comment #9 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 13:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=15991)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15991&action=view)
updated patch
> - the error message we give in this case is pretty poor. Here we have an
>empty initializer, but
--- Comment #8 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 11:55 ---
Thanks Jakub, Dodji for working on this. Some comments:
Some nits:
- the error message we give in this case is pretty poor. Here we have an
empty initializer, but the error message we get back is "void value not
--- Comment #7 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 09:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=15989)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15989&action=view)
fixed a typo.
Woops, thanks Paolo. I have Updated the patch.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-01 09:07
---
Typo in dg-options: you mean c++0x
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36408
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 08:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=15988)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15988&action=view)
first fix attempt.
This patch fixes the problem for me on gcc-4_3-branch.
Regtested for x86_64 on gcc-4_3-branch
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-12 10:13 ---
Only partly fixed so far - we don't ICE anymore, but no warning is generated.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-06/msg00474.html
Doug, any ideas how to differentiate between pack expansion resulting in no
tsub
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-11 06:48 ---
Subject: Bug 36408
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 11 06:47:36 2008
New Revision: 136652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136652
Log:
PR c++/36408
* semantics.c (stmt_expr_value_expr)
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-11 06:31 ---
Subject: Bug 36408
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 11 06:30:55 2008
New Revision: 136651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136651
Log:
PR c++/36408
* semantics.c (stmt_expr_value_expr)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36408
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36408
15 matches
Mail list logo
