--- Comment #6 from Bernd dot Donner at gmx dot net 2008-05-19 00:18
---
Sorry, this is my fault your comments are correct.
--
Bernd dot Donner at gmx dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-05-19 00:16
---
And you are certainly wrong that the Standard allows to omit the definition, in
this case. This is 9.4.2/4 oc C++03, note the last sentence:
If a static data member is of const integral or const enumeration ty
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-05-19 00:10
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 30745 ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from Bernd dot Donner at gmx dot net 2008-05-19 00:00
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> In other terms, just add, after the declaration of struct A:
>
> const int A::N;
>
According to the C++ standard "static const" member variables can be declarend
_and_ defined immediat
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-05-18 22:58
---
In other terms, just add, after the declaration of struct A:
const int A::N;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36261
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-18 22:52 ---
std::min(1, A::N)
std::min takes a reference to a const type which means you need the defintion
of A::N including the definition.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
