--- Comment #2 from yuriry at gmail dot com 2008-03-31 07:10 ---
Hi Björn,
Thank you for the link and setting me straight. You are correct,
implementation of a pure virtual function by the class that declares it makes
sense. It is just the class itself remains abstract.
Earlier today
--- Comment #1 from herwig at gdsys dot de 2008-03-31 06:41 ---
Hi yuri,
I think, this is perfectly correct code and GCC is right in accepting it. First
of all, see "Effective C++" issue 14 about the pure virtual destructor. Then
see here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_function#
