--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 22:02 ---
> void* is a pointer to fundamental type so has no associated namespaces
Well there is a still open defect report that says this might not be true :).
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29131 ***
--
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 22:01 ---
Actually
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RE
--- Comment #4 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 21:58 ---
In resolving dependent names, names from the following sources are considered:
Declarations that are visible at the point of definition of the
template.
Declarations from namespaces associated with the types of the f
--- Comment #3 from rvovsd at mail dot ru 2008-01-21 14:43 ---
This case is similar to the bug 31047
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31047).
There Andrew Pinski wrote (comment 4):
>14.6.4.2/1 says this is invalid code.
>For a function call that depends on a template paramet
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 22:30 ---
*** Bug 34893 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34886
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 21:55 ---
GCC is correct here. Well partly. It should reject it no matter what.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34886
