--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-17 12:26 ---
Confirmed. Even if it doesn't look like it makes sense to have an explicit
copy constructor, the standard does not seem to prohibit this.
But,
B f(A const &a) { return B(a); }
invokes the copy constructor for B,
--- Comment #1 from kristian dot spangsege at gmail dot com 2008-01-17
07:37 ---
Just tested it on the latest release 4.2.2 build from source with no patches
and the ICE is still there.
System:
g++ (GCC) 4.2.2
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.20-1.2952.fc6 #1 SMP Wed May 16 18:59:18 EDT
