--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 15:05 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I know about that. The class don't need a contructor, it does not have
> anything
> that needs to be assigned upon creation. Why should the compiler link in code
> that does not do anythin
--- Comment #2 from olof dot tangrot at telia dot com 2008-01-16 14:16
---
I know about that. The class don't need a contructor, it does not have anything
that needs to be assigned upon creation. Why should the compiler link in code
that does not do anything? I eats memory. Surely that
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 13:32 ---
EDG says:
t.C(27): error: const variable "sM" requires an initializer -- class
"signalManager" has no explicitly declared default constructor
} const sM ;
^
compilation aborted for t.C (code 2)
whic