--- Comment #4 from mrs at apple dot com 2008-01-14 23:21 ---
Ah, I thought someone just hadn't gotten around to moving the state to fixed,
sorry.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34783
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-14 21:38 ---
And that bug is not closed yet so what is the issue there?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11856 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Ad
--- Comment #2 from mrs at apple dot com 2008-01-14 20:08 ---
No, that bug report has a hack around, not a fix. A fix would make it work by
default out of the box.
A fix would avoid these for templated types and leave them for non-templated
types.
--
mrs at apple dot com changed:
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-14 19:42 ---
You know bugzilla has a search for a reason?
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11856 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
