[Bug c++/34778] terminate called after throwing an instance of

2010-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-29 22:56 --- (In reply to comment #9) > you're throwing a string literal and trying to catch a char*, that's invalid I should clarify that - it's not invalid to TRY to catch a char* but it will fail, and the program will terminate

[Bug c++/34778] terminate called after throwing an instance of

2010-04-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-29 22:55 --- you're throwing a string literal and trying to catch a char*, that's invalid if you change it to catch(const char*) it works fine with 4.4.3 -- redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/34778] terminate called after throwing an instance of

2008-01-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-16 15:01 --- This testcase does not work even without shared libraries: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'char const*' Abort -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34778

[Bug c++/34778] terminate called after throwing an instance of

2008-01-16 Thread tkiernan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 from tkiernan at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 12:32 --- (From update of attachment 14947) Attached is the source code and binary - issue is on gcc4.1.1 Linux redhat4.5, IBM ppc64. It aborts when tries to rethrow exception across shared libs. Execute ./main -- http://gcc.

[Bug c++/34778] terminate called after throwing an instance of

2008-01-16 Thread tkiernan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from tkiernan at gmail dot com 2008-01-16 12:29 --- Created an attachment (id=14947) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14947&action=view) TestCase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34778

[Bug c++/34778] terminate called after throwing an instance of

2008-01-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-14 18:34 --- Ok, what about a reproducible testcase then? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/34778] terminate called after throwing an instance of

2008-01-14 Thread tkiernan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from tkiernan at gmail dot com 2008-01-14 13:01 --- I have reconfigued gcc4.2.2 withou the enable-sjlij-exceptions flag and still getting the same behaviour ... -- tkiernan at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/34778] terminate called after throwing an instance of

2008-01-14 Thread tkiernan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from tkiernan at gmail dot com 2008-01-14 12:16 --- (In reply to comment #2) > -enable-sjlj-execptions Why are you using that option? This causes an ABI > incompatiable with the default GCC build. > Ok , I have reconfigured gcc4.2.2 without this option again ... How e

[Bug c++/34778] terminate called after throwing an instance of

2008-01-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-14 12:07 --- -enable-sjlj-execptions Why are you using that option? This causes an ABI incompatiable with the default GCC build. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Ad

[Bug c++/34778] terminate called after throwing an instance of

2008-01-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-14 12:05 --- *** Bug 34779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34778