[Bug c++/34624] valid c++ code doesn't compile for x86_64, but for i386

2008-12-30 Thread tim at klingt dot org
--- Comment #9 from tim at klingt dot org 2008-12-30 10:00 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Created an attachment (id=17010) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17010&action=view) [edit] > preprocessed source with -m32 > (In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (i

[Bug c++/34624] valid c++ code doesn't compile for x86_64, but for i386

2008-12-30 Thread tim at klingt dot org
--- Comment #8 from tim at klingt dot org 2008-12-30 09:59 --- Created an attachment (id=17010) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17010&action=view) preprocessed source with -m32 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34624

[Bug c++/34624] valid c++ code doesn't compile for x86_64, but for i386

2008-12-30 Thread tim at klingt dot org
--- Comment #7 from tim at klingt dot org 2008-12-30 09:58 --- Created an attachment (id=17009) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17009&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34624

[Bug c++/34624] valid c++ code doesn't compile for x86_64, but for i386

2008-12-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 05:39 --- Can you attach the preprocessed source for the -m64 case? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/34624] valid c++ code doesn't compile for x86_64, but for i386

2008-09-22 Thread tim at klingt dot org
--- Comment #5 from tim at klingt dot org 2008-09-22 12:11 --- i have the same issue with both gcc-4.3 and gcc-4.4 ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34624

[Bug c++/34624] valid c++ code doesn't compile for x86_64, but for i386

2008-01-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-14 10:50 --- EDG says t.ii(13): error: no instance of function template "get_samples" matches the argument list argument types are: (my_table) const float * ptr = get_samples(tab); ^ comp

[Bug c++/34624] valid c++ code doesn't compile for x86_64, but for i386

2008-01-13 Thread Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2008-01-14 07:42 --- This fails with both -m32 and -m64 (but I'm not quite sure if it still reproduces the original issue): typedef unsigned long size_t; template struct array { }; template struct my_table: public array { }; templ

[Bug c++/34624] valid c++ code doesn't compile for x86_64, but for i386

2008-01-13 Thread tim at klingt dot org
--- Comment #2 from tim at klingt dot org 2008-01-13 12:38 --- ... i tried when reporting the bug ... however i haven't really been able create a stripped down version ... the problem also occurs when using std::tr1::array instead of boost::array, though ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug c++/34624] valid c++ code doesn't compile for x86_64, but for i386

2008-01-12 Thread bangerth at dealii dot org
--- Comment #1 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-01-13 02:23 --- Can you try to reduce this to something smaller that doesn't require boost? -- bangerth at dealii dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -