--- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-04 20:05 ---
Try asking for help on some Linux mailing list, because gettid is (or was) a
Linux extension, actually. In any case, what is available or not on such system
headers has nothing to do with GCC.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from razin at avaya dot com 2007-10-04 19:37 ---
Ok. That's just the test. I can remove namespace completely:
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
gettid();
return 0;
}
Same result. Actually I figured it will bring up questions, sorry
--
razin
--- Comment #4 from razin at avaya dot com 2007-10-04 18:46 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Why should gettid be in namespace std? It's not a standard C++ function,
> so the header file declares it to be in the global namespace.
>
> W.
>
(In reply to comment #3)
> Why should gettid be
--- Comment #3 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-10-04 18:41 ---
Why should gettid be in namespace std? It's not a standard C++ function,
so the header file declares it to be in the global namespace.
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 18:40 ---
And this is not a bug with GCC or libstdc++ as gettid is an GNU libc extension.
Try using gettid instead of std::gettid. Doing that and qualifying endl with
std:: allows for this program to compile.
--
pinskia
--- Comment #1 from razin at avaya dot com 2007-10-04 18:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=14296)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14296&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33660
