--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-17 04:13 ---
Fixed for 4.6.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIG
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-16 21:05 ---
Subject: Bug 32505
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 16 21:05:16 2010
New Revision: 162269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162269
Log:
PR c++/32505
* pt.c (process_partial_specializati
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-16 16:22 ---
Confirmed; no diagnostic is required by the standard, but we really ought to
give one anyway. Simpler testcase:
template struct A { };
A a;
template struct A { }; // { dg-error "A" }
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 23:54 ---
[temp.class.spec]/1
"A partial specialization shall be declared before the first use of a
class template specialization that would make use of the partial specialization
as the result of an implicit or explicit instantia
--- Comment #1 from dascandy at gmail dot com 2007-06-25 20:51 ---
The problem doesn't produce a warning when compiled with -Wall -Wextra
-pedantic. One of these (I expect -Wall is the best fit) should produce a
warning.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32505
