--- Comment #15 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-08-17 21:40 ---
Already fixed in 4_2-branch and mainline.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 21:38 ---
Subject: Bug 32190
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Aug 17 21:38:40 2007
New Revision: 127599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127599
Log:
2007-08-17 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/3
--- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 21:38 ---
Subject: Bug 32190
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Aug 17 21:38:19 2007
New Revision: 127598
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127598
Log:
2007-08-17 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/3
--- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 21:31 ---
Subject: Bug 32190
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Aug 17 21:31:40 2007
New Revision: 127597
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127597
Log:
2007-08-17 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/3
--- Comment #11 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2007-08-17 17:25 ---
Subject: Re: wrong error recovery on parsing template arguments
Seems impractical. I don't have access to the old versions or mainline,
and don't know what magic to put in the source for your system to use.
I'm sure
--- Comment #10 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 10:50 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Subject: Re: wrong error recovery on parsing template arguments
>
> Begging your pardon, but what's wrong with the one I put in already?
>
Nothing is wrong, but to be useful for GCC tests
--- Comment #9 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2007-08-17 10:37 ---
Subject: Re: wrong error recovery on parsing template arguments
Begging your pardon, but what's wrong with the one I put in already?
Ivan
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot g
--- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 10:28 ---
Ivan, would you like to write, test and post the testcase? Once it is approved
I can commit it for you (with your name of course!).
A starting point will be http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HowToPrepareATestcase, if you
need fur
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-08-17 10:26 ---
Sure, I'll take care of that...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32190
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-17 10:24 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This is now fixed both in mainline and in 4_2-branch:
>
> 32190.C: In function 'int main()':
> 32190.C:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
>
> at this point, not being a regression, I t
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-08-17 10:22 ---
This is now fixed both in mainline and in 4_2-branch:
32190.C: In function 'int main()':
32190.C:5: error: template argument 1 is invalid
at this point, not being a regression, I think we can close it.
--
pcarlini at
--- Comment #4 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2007-06-04 14:27 ---
Well, in my ignorance, I'd say that the symptoms are consistent with scanning
forward to the next ">", regardless of what gets scanned over, such an
unmatched "<" or statement-lists.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-04 13:51 ---
Likely, the code for parsing template arguments is not clever enough to stop as
soon as something goes awry and report it correctly.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
13 matches
Mail list logo
