--- Comment #9 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-12-30 14:45 ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-12/msg01280.html
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-12-29 23:29 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> if (! CLASS_TYPE_P (t))
> return 0; /* other non-class type (reference or function) */
> if (CLASSTYPE_NON_POD_P (t))
> return 0;
> return 1;
>
> One of those two should be set c
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 21:02 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > It is *not* represented as an array on Alpha.
>
> But as a RECORD_TYPE. Following patch cures the warning:
But that is not correct as some nonPODs are structs
--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-12-29 20:57 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It is *not* represented as an array on Alpha.
But as a RECORD_TYPE. Following patch cures the warning:
Index: cp/tree.c
===
--- c
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 20:46 ---
sounds like the C++ front-end does not know this struct is a POD. I am going
to mark this as a front-end bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
