--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 12:28 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25220 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from christian dot heinlein at uni-ulm dot de 2006-10-30
11:43 ---
*** Bug 29647 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29645
--- Comment #3 from christian dot heinlein at uni-ulm dot de 2006-10-30
11:41 ---
*** Bug 29646 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29645
--- Comment #2 from christian dot heinlein at uni-ulm dot de 2006-10-30
11:38 ---
No! A "static const int" member which is only used as a compile time constant
does not need a definition, if I understand the C++ standard correctly.
(And in most cases, the code produced by GCC actually d
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 11:05 ---
You need to provide a definition of X::a and X::b.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
