--- Comment #5 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-10-31 00:01 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> COtherClass(5, m_szSzField, NULL, 0,
> "ImmString1").Method1().Method2(m_ullProblemField)("ImmString2",
> m_pvPointerField)("ImmString3", m_ullProblemField);
> [...]
> The probl
--
oder at eleks dot lviv dot ua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29582
--- Comment #4 from oder at eleks dot lviv dot ua 2006-10-30 08:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=12509)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12509&action=view)
Compilable testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29582
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-29 20:40 ---
Do you have a testcase that actually compiles?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from oder at eleks dot lviv dot ua 2006-10-24 16:09 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The evaluation order of function arguments is not specified. If you depend on
> side effects to be carried out at a specific point you must make sure there is
> a sequence point at the appr
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-10-24 16:02 ---
The evaluation order of function arguments is not specified. If you depend on
side effects to be carried out at a specific point you must make sure there is
a sequence point at the appropriate place.
--
schwab at suse do
