--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-22 18:33 ---
As a dup of bug 15145.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15145 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-22 18:33 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> One has still to use the -Wsequence-point, in C++?
> It would be good if there was no need to explicitly use such a switch...
For 4.1 (and maybe 4.0 I forget), -Wall includes -Wsequence-po
--- Comment #4 from moura at kdewebdev dot org 2006-04-20 14:49 ---
One has still to use the -Wsequence-point, in C++?
It would be good if there was no need to explicitly use such a switch...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27224
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 12:06 ---
... to close as fixed in 4.0.0.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 12:05 ---
Oh, you used C++ but filed against C. Reopen bug...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-20 12:04 ---
It's called -Wsequence-point, but it's not perfect. See also PR18050.
int *v;
int i;
void f(int, int);
void foo(void)
{
v[i] = i++;
f(v[i], i++);
}
/space/rguenther/install/gcc-3.4.4/bin/gcc -Wsequence-point -
