--- Comment #13 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-22 12:33 ---
Mine.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|dnovillo at gcc d
--- Comment #12 from dnovillo at redhat dot com 2006-03-09 19:28 ---
Subject: Re: ICE (segfault) on C++ OpenMP code
On 03/09/06 14:17, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> If you had written a status on this bug before I closed it as a dup,
> I would not have closed it as a dup bec
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 19:17
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> If you are so keen on closing PRs, close 26076 as a duplicate of this one.
If you had written a status on this bug before I closed it as a dup, I would
not have closed it as a dup becau
--- Comment #10 from dnovillo at redhat dot com 2006-03-09 19:10 ---
Subject: Re: ICE (segfault) on C++ OpenMP code
On 03/09/06 14:03, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Then there are two issues, one for the reduced testcase which is PR 26076 and
> another issue. But please don
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 19:03 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Andrew, please do not close bugs if you do not understand the problem. You
> obviously have not even tried to understand the problem. This PR is related
> to
> 26076 but it is *not* a du
--- Comment #8 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 19:01
---
Andrew, please do not close bugs if you do not understand the problem. You
obviously have not even tried to understand the problem. This PR is related to
26076 but it is *not* a duplicate.
The patch that I deve
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 18:49 ---
PR 26076 has a reducer testcase and I can reduce the testcase in here into that
one.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26076 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remov
