https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24928
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24928
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ajrobb57 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24928
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24928
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
With -fimplicit-constexpr, GCC do the optimization, maybe this will become part
of the C++ standard in the future
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24928
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
--- Comment #3 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-11-18 01:31
---
Subject: Re: New: Trivial static const objects should go to .rodata
"msharov at hotmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| With the object being initialized at runtime as if it mattered. Because the
| v
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-18 00:57 ---
Confirmed, very related to PR 4131.
First this is not a trivial static const object as there is no trivial
constructure here.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
