--- Additional Comments From andre_orwell at yahoo dot com dot au
2005-09-23 13:34 ---
Subject: Re: ambiguous overload reported for no obvious reason
Thanks - obvious when its pointed out. Sorry for the bother.
On Friday 23 September 2005 01:17, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-22
15:17 ---
the error message about ambiguous overload is correct as there are two
functions there.
operator* in the global namespace and operator* in the NS namespace.
You most likely wanted to implement operator* in
