--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 15:42 ---
To mark as a dup of bug 12970.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12970 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 15:42 ---
Reopening to ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-09-20 20:35
---
Oh yeah - I've fallen into (and reported) that one before. How quickly we
forget!
You know, a "perhaps you meant 'this->foo'?" in the diagnostic ould cut down on
the redundant reports you guys get :-)
Ivan
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-20
14:35 ---
Read http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
In a template definition, unqualified names will no longer find members of a
dependent base (as
specified by [temp.dep]/3 in the C++ standard). For example,
