--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-08-30 00:09 ---
Subject: Re: -Wsign-compare and const propagation
"bangerth at dealii dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| As annoying as this is, I don't consider this a bug. It may be classified
| as an enhance
--- Additional Comments From br1 at internet dot com dot uy 2005-08-29
23:23 ---
I don't know much about const in C, just C++. I just wanted to have this
request entered in your database, as a possible enhancement, of course.
Regards,
Bruno
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-08-29 23:10
---
What Andrew is trying to say is that in C, even variables that are marked
'const' can be modified. Thus, the compiler can't (naively, i.e. without
using flow analysis) determine that 'i' or 'ic' have the val
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-08-29
23:01 ---
Subject: Re: -Wsign-compare and const propagation
On Aug 29, 2005, at 6:24 PM, br1 at internet dot com dot uy wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From br1 at internet dot com dot uy
> 2005-08-29
On Aug 29, 2005, at 6:24 PM, br1 at internet dot com dot uy wrote:
--- Additional Comments From br1 at internet dot com dot uy
2005-08-29 22:24 ---
Could you point me to the section in the standard? I thought warning
were a
quality of implementation matter.
No you misunderstood
--- Additional Comments From br1 at internet dot com dot uy 2005-08-29
22:24 ---
Could you point me to the section in the standard? I thought warning were a
quality of implementation matter.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23608
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29
02:34 ---
ic by the C++ standard does not need to propagate its value into ic < 5u so I
think the warning is
warranted.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23608
