--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
02:34 ---
Assigning to Daniel Berlin by his request.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|mark at
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
02:31 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] C++ generates incorrect
overlapping fields
On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 02:06 +, mark at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From mark at codesource
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-28 02:06
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] C++ generates incorrect overlapping
fields
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> However, the questions still remains, what is the offset supposed to be
> relative to?
The
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-28
02:03 ---
I meant the next field of *B* was a type_decl
fields
unsigned SI
size
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1>
unsigned virtual SI file /home/dbe
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-27 21:13
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] C++ generates incorrect overlapping
fields
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
> 20:42 ---
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
20:42 ---
We have a var of type C named D.2117
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set 21
fields
ignored decl_6 BLK file /home/dberlin/22488.cc line 18
size
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-27
16:32 ---
I don't see what the alleged front-end bug is in this PR.
The layout I would expect for C on IA32 GNU/Linux would be:
0: B's vptr
4: i0
8: i1
12: c
16: A's vptr
20: i
24: c0
25: c1
That is exactly what I
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-18
15:39 ---
*** Bug 23949 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-05
14:20 ---
And here is a testcase for 64bits:
struct S02 { bool V01, V02; };
struct S03 {unsigned char V03; int V04; };
struct S05 { static void F01 ( int &P01, void *P02, void *P03 ); };
struct S07 {};
struct S0
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-05
14:19 ---
*** Bug 23729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-29
13:57 ---
I've changed the summary to match what the actual bug appears to be, at least
until a C++ person tells us whether it's supposed to be generating these
overlaps or not.
--
What|Removed
12 matches
Mail list logo
