[Bug c++/21799] [4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-21 16:00 --- Giovanni, I can confirm that your patch for PR 8271 also fixes the problem in this PR. I would be extremely grateful if it would move somewhere... Cheers Wolfgang -- What|Removed

[Bug c++/21799] [4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-21 15:55 --- I also see this problem on the 4.0 branch now, with gcc version 4.0.1 20050531 (prerelease) I am pretty sure that it wasn't there in 4.0.0, but don't know for sure any more... W. -- http://gcc.gnu.

[Bug c++/21799] [4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-06-21 00:19 --- Does my patch for 8271 fix this bug? If so, whatever caused this might just have exposed the problem, and fixing 8271 would fix this as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21799

[Bug c++/21799] [4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-20 21:30 --- Since this PR prevents me from running my nightly tests for more than 2 months now, could someone try to run the regression finder on the small testcase to find out who broke this and when? The duplicate of th

[Bug c++/21799] [4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-05-31 17:56 --- *** Bug 21066 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added Bug 21799 de

[Bug c++/21799] [4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-31 17:22 --- I think this is a dup of bug 21066. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|

[Bug c++/21799] [4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

-- Bug 21799 depends on bug 21801, which changed state. Bug 21801 Summary: Accepts invalid for const member pointer functions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21801 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug c++/21799] [4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-05-31 13:49 --- The PR Andrew cites is essentially a duplicate of PR 8271, which has been around for 2 1/2 years already. It is about the fact that gcc accepts a pointer to a constant member function for an argument that does

[Bug c++/21799] [4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-28 17:55 --- Confirmed, I noticed that we accept the code if we get rid of the second template function (see PR 21801) so in GCC's mind it is ambiguous. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/21799] [4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21