--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
14:20 ---
> Looks like it to me too, and I easily could have fallen into the same hole
twice
> because it comes from a use of a shared library.
> Does a single fix make both go away?
One never knows for sure until
--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-05-23 18:10
---
Looks like it to me too, and I easily could have fallen into the same hole
twice
because it comes from a use of a shared library. Does a single fix make both go
away?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-23
14:32 ---
Ivan, this looks like a duplicate of your PR 20789 to me.
Or is there any major difference?
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-05-19 20:50
---
Created an attachment (id=8930)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8930&action=view)
source code (compressed)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21670
--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-05-19 20:49
---
Created an attachment (id=8929)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8929&action=view)
compiler output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21670
