[Bug c++/21487] new object affectation in a switch

2005-05-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 14:51 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Subject: RE: new object affectation in a switch > > So, I don't understand why : ... > is OK for g++. Because there is no initialization of a variable in the declaration. >

[Bug c++/21487] new object affectation in a switch

2005-05-10 Thread sebmaestro at hotmail dot com
se 2: break; case 3: break; } is rejected with a french and english (:-D) error message ! >From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Bug c++/21487] new object affectation in

[Bug c++/21487] new object affectation in a switch

2005-05-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 13:12 --- This is how C++ works, you can actually fall through case statements. This is invalid code and G++ rejects it correctly. -- What|Removed |Added ---