[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||EisahLee at gmx dot de --- Comment #11 f

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #9) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > > The C++0x override control works for virtual and non-virtual names > > That's not true for what then beca

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 Stephan Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sbergman at redhat dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 13:01:43 UTC --- Yup, that's why I haven't closed this as a duplicate. The C++0x override control works for virtual and non-virtual names, so is relevant to this PR *and* the others. Noting and l

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #6 from loose at astron dot nl 2010-11-01 12:54:25 UTC --- OK, fair enough. However, I reported this "bug", because I would like GCC to produce a warning when hiding a non-virtual method in *existing* code; an option similar to -Woverl

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 12:39:48 UTC --- also, GNU-style attributes are not being removed from GCC, even if C++0x attributes get dropped my point was just that there are several similar bugs and that whatever it looks like

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 12:36:45 UTC --- Attributes were still in the FCD, and are still in the current draft, but might be removed. Override control may not be done by attributes, but will be present in C++0x in some form

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #3 from loose at astron dot nl 2010-11-01 12:29:27 UTC --- As far as I know attributes were removed from the C0x Final Draft. Besides, if GCC were to provide a compiler flag to warn for this, you would also be able to catch potential bu

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-01 11:22:26 UTC --- This would also be solved by the "override control" features coming in C++0x c.f. PR 17920, PR 31397, PR 36848

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-02 01:00 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E