https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20423
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20423
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:113844d68e94f4e9c0e946db351ba7d3d4a1335a
commit r13-1262-g113844d68e94f4e9c0e946db351ba7d3d4a1335a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20423
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-19 21:23 ---
Not working on this now.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assig
--- Comment #10 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-08-11 14:24
---
as with bug 31937, there is overlap between this enhancement and the 'Explicit
Virtual Function Overrides' paper,
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2928.htm
the attributes proposed in that
--- Comment #9 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2009-07-21 17:36
---
(In reply to comment #0)
>
> This is also not conforming to the "specification" in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/1999-08n/msg01069.html
>
> Warn when a derived class function declaration may be an error in
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-18 06:10 ---
An old patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/1999-03n/msg00182.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20423
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from Woebbeking at web dot de 2008-11-30 15:36 ---
Any progress on this?
This warning could be really useful if only 1) would be handled. In its current
state I can't use it as I get too many "false" positives :-(
--
Woebbeking at web dot de changed:
What
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 10:01 ---
A really wild-guess patch. Comments?
Index: gcc/cp/class.c
===
--- gcc/cp/class.c (revision 121953)
+++ gcc/cp/class.c (working copy)
@@ -2377,
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-14 22:30 ---
I am looking at this but it is a bit hard to see how to make the distinction
between the two kinds. I don't want to introduce yet another loop in
warn_hidden but perhaps that is unavoidable. Any hints?
--
http://gc
--- Comment #4 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 02:23 ---
Agreed with the reporter's analysis
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29
14:10 ---
*** Bug 20683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From micis at gmx dot de 2005-03-11 17:30 ---
I think there a two different situations:
1) in the derived class you define a method with the same name but
different parameters.
This is typically a serious bug in your program which can result in the
exectutio
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-11
15:11 ---
Hmm, ICC gives:
t.cc(7): warning #654: overloaded virtual function "Foo::Func" is only
partially overridden in class "Baz"
class Baz: public Foo
^
t.cc(14): error #165: too few arguments in funct
15 matches
Mail list logo
