--- Comment #8 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 19:40 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The use of a base class ( class B : A ) is not a declaration of A.
> Thus the base class ( class A ) is visible and not private.
>
> Reopen the bug and fix it.
Andrew was right: the name 'A' i
--- Comment #7 from s dot franke at bebbosoft dot de 2010-03-03 19:26
---
The C++ Standard says:
3.4 Name lookup
The name lookup rules apply uniformly to all names (including typedef-names
(7.1.3), namespace-names (7.3) and class-names (9.1)) wherever the grammar
allows such names in t
--- Additional Comments From matthew dot whitney at gmail dot com
2005-03-10 14:10 ---
Thanks for the explanation - I understand what's happening now. Next time I'll
take it to comp.lang.c++.moderated before bothering you guys. Anyway sorry to
have wasted your time.
--
http://gcc.gnu
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-10
06:56 ---
Just ask on comp.lang.c++.moderated for more information. We help with C++
issues a little, but we cannot explaint things in detail to every C++
developer in the world.
Ah, and when Andrew said "interjecte
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2005-03-10 03:45 ---
Subject: Re: g++ rejects valid code with 'is inaccessible' error
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:25:03AM -, matthew dot whitney at gmail dot com
wrote:
> Now it compiles fine. Before this is closed again I'd like to
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-10
03:33 ---
Huh? unused paramaters are still need to be able to compile and be accessible.
If that compiler handles this code, well that compiler has a bug in it.
ICC gives the following warning though (but note it s
--- Additional Comments From matthew dot whitney at gmail dot com
2005-03-10 02:25 ---
Could someone take another look at this? I don't mean to waste your time, but I
don't understand the explanation given. I know of another compiler that handles
the example code without any problems.
I
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09
21:49 ---
No gcc is correct because the type A is interjected into B. and is private as
the base class is private.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
