http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20201
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-16 15:43 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I agree with Manuel. One error should be one error, regardless of the number
> of
> lines it takes to print it.
>
> Two errors should be two errors, etc etc etc.
>
> Seems like a pretty sim
--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-09 12:51 ---
I agree with Manuel. One error should be one error, regardless of the number of
lines it takes to print it.
Two errors should be two errors, etc etc etc.
Seems like a pretty simple rule to me.
I find myself wishing
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-09 12:05 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> One problem with this proposal is that sometimes the user just wants one
> actual
> error (the C++ error messages are multiline, but are still one message) and it
> is difficult to estimate w
--- Comment #3 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 05:22 ---
One problem with this proposal is that sometimes the user just wants one actual
error (the C++ error messages are multiline, but are still one message) and it
is difficult to estimate what a good value of is to ensure t
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30
06:02 ---
Add a counter and there it works.
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-05-27 00:02
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-25
08:43 ---
Confirmed.
Would be a Good Thing IMHO.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
