--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29
00:00 ---
This is undefined behavior, and it is not worthwhile to try to make this work.
There are existing ways (offsetof and poiners-to-members) to accomplish what the
submitter wants to do.
--
What
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-01-26 04:12
---
This is certainly undefined code: you are dereferencing the Null pointer.
It's a different matter of QoI whether we want to support this anyway.
It's basically a different way to say offsetof, an area in which
--- Additional Comments From fm3 at os dot inf dot tu-dresden dot de
2005-01-24 15:12 ---
added myself as cc
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-24
15:04 ---
Also one note is that 3.4.0 produces the same as 3.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19605
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-24
15:02 ---
Someone else has to say if this is valid C++ but I think it is just undefined
but I could be wrong.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
