--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-10 08:38
---
*** Bug 32270 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #9 from ian at airs dot com 2006-12-14 06:03 ---
Will be fixed in gcc 4.3.
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #8 from ian at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-14 05:49 ---
Subject: Bug 19564
Author: ian
Date: Thu Dec 14 05:49:06 2006
New Revision: 119855
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119855
Log:
PR c++/19564
PR c++/19756
gcc/:
* c-typeck.c
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-12 18:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/19564
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00868.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #6 from ian at airs dot com 2006-12-12 18:00 ---
Copyright status is cleared, my patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00868.html
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from ian at airs dot com 2006-12-01 06:18 ---
The patches are ready to go in as soon as Google's copyright assignment clears.
The assignment has been signed on both sides and is in the mail, or so I am
told.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19564
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 23:15 ---
what is the status of these patches? I just started to look into this..
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from ian at airs dot com 2006-02-08 17:56 ---
I have a patch to add full support for -Wparentheses to the C++ frontend, which
I will submit when copyright status is cleared up.
--
ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21
14:12 ---
Note here is the testcase:
int f(int a, int b)
{
if (a>0 & b>0) /* { dg-warning "" } */
return 210;
return 0;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19564
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21
14:11 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> g++ generates less warnings when using -Wparentheses than gcc. For instance
> gcc warns about
>
> if (a>0 & b>0)
> ...
This because this warning is only in the C
10 matches
Mail list logo
