--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07
00:56 ---
It worked with 4.0.0 20041124 so this is a new regression :(.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07
00:54 ---
I decided to take a different method to reducing this testcase by using the old
style copy and paste
method which is better sometimes at reducing testcases (in fact much better and
faster with C++
code):
--- Additional Comments From wanderer at rsu dot ru 2005-01-06 23:47
---
Created an attachment (id=7890)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7890&action=view)
With removed (mostly) iostreams and some other
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19298
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06
21:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=7887)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7887&action=view)
a little more reduced
This is as far as I getting, not much but a start, someone else wants to start
red
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Summary|Error compiling Boost.Python|[4.0 Regression] Error
|test
