--- Additional Comments From jeff at connectrf dot com 2005-01-10 18:45
---
Andrew,
A view from the ld folks. They believe that the ld is failing due to the
-fpreprocessed switch not producing the .o file..
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-01-10 17:57
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06
15:42 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > This is not a gcc bug, either this is your bug and the .o file is not an
> object file or this is a binutils bug.
>
> Andrew, then perhaps you can exp
--- Additional Comments From jeff at connectrf dot com 2005-01-06 15:33
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is not a gcc bug, either this is your bug and the .o file is not an
object file or this is a binutils bug.
Andrew, then perhaps you can explain why the exact same code compiles, l
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05
21:56 ---
This is not a gcc bug, either this is your bug and the .o file is not an object
file or this is a binutils bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
