--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27
16:13 ---
Subject: Bug 19148
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-27 16:13:45
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/t
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27
16:06 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RE
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-27
16:06 ---
Subject: Bug 19148
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-27 16:06:15
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog gimplify.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-25
18:50 ---
P1 since this blocks QT.
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-25
18:49 ---
*** Bug 19153 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24 20:33
---
Nope. The reason it doesn't have the parameter now is because it didn't use it,
and for private functions missing parameters are superior to ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-12-24 20:32
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed
On 24 Dec 2004 20:26:38 -, "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding a post_p parameter to gimplify_cond_expr fixes the p
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-12-24 20:28
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE: gimplification failed
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Is there any reason that's not a bad idea?
s|bad|good
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24
20:26 ---
The front end is generating as the RHS:
(INDIRECT_REF
(NOP_EXPR
(ADDR_EXPR
(TARGET_EXPR
(COND_EXPR
...)))
which seems reasonable. The LHS is:
(INDIRECT_REF
(SAVE_EXPR
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24
18:05 ---
It also worked with 20041221.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19148
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24
17:59 ---
Reduced testcase:
struct QChar {
QChar( char c );
QChar( const QChar& c );
unsigned short ucs;
} ;
void f(QChar *uc, unsigned short ch, QChar replacement)
{
*uc++ = ((ch) ? QChar((1)) : replace
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-24
17:47 ---
This is a very recent regression.
It worked with 20041216 but fails with 20041223.
--
What|Removed |Added
12 matches
Mail list logo
