https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18950
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|bkoz at redh
--- Additional Comments From boris at buf dot com 2004-12-13 17:36 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> 3.3.2 also rejects this code also:
I'm really sorry, it seems I oversimplified our real test case
(the previous problem might be related, but indeed it's not a regression).
The follow
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13
18:09 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
>
> Sorry about the misinformation in the first place.
I split this off to PR 18962, yes that testcase is a regression, but I think
the problem which
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13
15:54 ---
3.3.2 also rejects this code also:
pr18950.cc:11: error: template-id `function<>' for `T2 Class::function(T2)' does not match any template declaration
pr18950.cc:11: error: syntax error before `{' token
--
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-13
15:27 ---
Should be allowed according to 14.7.3/16. All my GCC versions
fail to compile the testcase (maybe some 3.3.x does) so I can't
verify that it's a regression.
The problem is some incorrect logic in 'determ
